Sunday, December 9, 2012

Michael Jackson and the Bloodied Shirt

       Yes, you read the title correctly.  There apparently was a bloodied shirt found in Michael Jackson's Carol wood home after his supposed death, and yet no one ever talked about it in the Conrad Murray Manslaughter Trial.  I found this most interesting because if you watched this trial then you know clothing was discussed as far as saying that Michael's clothing was found on the bathroom floor.
          So I find it interesting that no one talked about this bloodied shirt.  No one talked about where it came from and whose blood was on it.  In fact, to this day I hadn't heard anything about this until I came upon a video from a person who does a series called, "What Did Happen on June 25th (Part 76), when in this video she discusses this.
Click Here to watch video.  Pay close attention to the time of 9:05 on the video because this is where this bloodied shirt is discussed.  I think you will probably find it just as interesting as I do.
          So one has to wonder why this piece of evidence was never brought up in the Conrad Murray trial.  I'd be really interested in knowing why they left this evidence out, wouldn’t you?

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Michael Jackson's Brother Jermaine Filed Court Documents to Change His Last Name. What's Up With That?

Okay, back on November 8, 2012, Michael Jackson's brother Jermaine filed papers in court to change his name to Jermaine Jacksun.  Now why he did this I can't really say.  I just find it strange that a man in his late fifties would want to do this.  I can't really say why Jermaine would do this but he said it is a career move.  I find this even stranger because technically the phonetic sound of his last name hasn't changed just the spelling.  It makes one think why he would just want to change one letter in his name.  When you think about it he's changing the ending from SON to SUN.  Okay, so the Jackson family has always had some strange thing going on around them and for some strange reason once again they are in the news.

          One has to wonder if he is doing this to give all of the Michael Jackson Death Hoax Believers another clue.  Do I think this?  Not really, but hey it is something to think about here.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Michael Jackson: Can We Now Say He Is Dead?

        Recently, someone asked me why I think that the Michael Jackson Death Hoax still continues today.  I guess I can understand why this person might have asked me this.  I mean, after all it has been almost three and a half years since we all heard that awful news that the King of Pop was dead, right?

        I have heard people since his death say that people who continue to believe in the death hoax must not have anything better to do with their lives.  Some have even picked on me for continuing to write this blog.  Yes, I have been writing it for over 1 year, and do I feel it is time to stop and close down this blog?  My answer is NO!  Absolutely NOT!

        I heard a rumor recently that Conrad Murray who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the Death of Jackson could be getting out of jail soon.  Yes, that would mean that he only would have served about two years of his four year sentence.  I don't know if this is 100% true, but it has been rumored.    Now, where this will leave this story at, I have no idea.  I do know that Conrad Murray did file an Appeal with the Appeals court and I expect any day now to find out if this Appeal will be granted.  Personally, I hope it is.  Now before anyone starts sending me email and yelling at me for hoping for such a thing, let me explain.  Let's be honest, as I have stated during many of my past blog entries that I truly believe we haven't heard everything is regards to all of this, and that I truly believe Mr. Murray needs to be granted another trial so that we all might (I pray) get the answers to the unanswered questions that many of us still feel we haven't heard yet.

        One last thing, I recently came across an article out here on the Internet which made me realize that Death Hoax's can happen at any time and to anyone. 

(CLICK HERE to read an article of how it happened to one such man). 

        So to all of the people who call the Michael Jackson Death Hoax BeLIEvers a bunch of kooks with nothing better to do, I hope you realize if it can happen to the man in the article above, than it just as well could have happened to Michael Jackson.




Friday, October 12, 2012

The Jackson's Unity Tour - Was There a Clue That We Should Have Been Paying Attention to?

          Recently, I discovered a video showing a piece from the "Jackson's Unity Tour" concert that they did this past summer.  In this concert they featured a picture of Michael behind the camera that was used for his "Liberian Girl" video.  When they showed this they sang the following words:

"I want to see you again…"

          Now I realize this could have just been done as a tribute to Michael and really didn't mean anything, but yet I thought it was strange that they would be featuring this picture of him of all the pictures that this guy ever took.  There have been many who have speculated that Michael is currently directing all of this from behind the camera since this all began.  Now to what extent they are referring, I'm not really sure.  I do, although find it strange that they would use the words: "I Want to See You Again".  I know some of you might just say it's how most of us feel after we lose a loved one, right?  Well, I might agree except I don't know if I would have placed it in a concert quite like that.  I think if I really wanted to give tribute to my decease brother in a concert I would just do a tribute to his music.  So when they sang the above words and showed the infamous picture of him behind the camera, I really thought this was rather strange.

          You can view what I am talking about by viewing this video by CLICKING HERE.  I think you will see what I am saying.  So am I making more out of this than there is, or is there a clue for all of us to pay attention to?  You'll have to decide that for yourself.


Saturday, October 6, 2012

Michael Jackson - Death Hoax: Some Have Questioned Me on Whether I Have the Right to Question Michael's Legal Name!

Recently, I've received a few comments telling me that I was way off track with Michael's legal name.  Since I didn't want to argue with anyone I thought I would share why I have questioned this more thoroughly.  I feel it's important that I do here because someone said I should be more careful about what I write on my blog and that I should be more accurate before I write about it.

Okay, so let me clarify this for all who have questioned me on this.  First, I don't just write things on this blog just to make it up and to create something.  Michael Jackson had enough of that when the various news media's inflated their stories in regards to him.  When I write something out here I want all of you to know that I have researched it enough to feel comfortable in stating it here.  When I'm not 100% sure, I always state it in my blog entries.

So let's talk a little more about Michael's legal name.  His birth certificate, which happens to be the first document that a person is ever given and it is signed by the doctor or whomever delivers you into the world.  The name placed on it is generally given by the mother or other type guardian in attendance.  Michael's birth certificate states his name as:  Michael Joe Jackson.  It is the reason why his Driver's License and Passport have this name on it.  In order to get these items you have to hand over your Birth Certificate.  I know this to be a fact because when I went and got my driver's license they asked me for my birth certificate.

Another interesting thing I found in regards to this was a video which talked about the District Attorney, Tom Sneddon who was the prosecutor in the 2005' Child Molestation trial making sure that all of the legal documents he presented to the court had the name: Michael Joe Jackson and not Michael Joseph Jackson because he didn't want to be caught in any type of technicality when he prosecuted Michael Jackson back then. 

Even Michael's own brother Jermaine talked about it in his book:

"You Are Not Alone: Michael, Through a Brother's Eye". Simon and Schuster. 2011-09-13. ISBN 1451651597 p.43 '"Joe" was his middle name, as recorded on his birth certificate. (Why Jermaine Jackson felt the need to write this in this book, one would have to wonder if he wanted to clarify it for all of us).

So if you are a person who doesn't think this should matter, that's fine I have no problem with that, but please understand that a person's legal name is extremely important when dealing with legal documents and the legitimacy of such a document.

If you still can't get behind what I am saying, then let's just agree to disagree with each other.  I have no ill will towards anyone.  Like I stated many blog entries ago if you don't want to read my blog, that's okay by me, I'm sure you can find a more suitable one out here in cyber space for your liking, but if you are looking for the truth in all of this, then I hope you will come back and know that I wouldn't state something out here without having all my facts together in regards to it.

NOTE:  There is another wonderful blog that gave me great researched information about this and I hope that those of you who are still questioning this will check it out.  There are a lot of great documents you can check out on this site: 

So let's all keep searching for the truth together, okay?

Monday, September 24, 2012

Michael Jackson's Supposed Death: Are They All Just Coincidences, or Is There Something Else We Should All Be Looking at Here?

I wanted to write this blog entry to talk about not just the coincidences that have circled around Michael Jackson’s supposed death, but the strange timing of it, and the things that happened shortly before and shortly after it.  One of the things that has stuck in my mind is the fact that Michael supposedly died the morning of June 25, 2009.  Why this has stuck in my mind is because this was the date Michael supposedly was to leave for London, (the very date), and to continue his rehearsals for the “This Is It” concert over there. (This timing was strange to say the least).


Then there is the fact that Michael rehired his long time estranged lawyer, John Branca just a week before his passing. (This timing was very strange also).  Then after his death John Branca just so happens to have Michael’s Last Will in Testament that he supposedly signed in Los Angeles back in 2002', but it has been reported that Michael wasn’t in Los Angeles, but in New York on the date that is on this document.


Another strange thing is something I just got done talking about in my previous blog entry, and that was all of the legal documents that don’t have Michael’s legal name on them, from:  "The Last Will and Testament, to the Autopsy, to the Death Certificate, to the involuntary manslaughter trial; oh and let's not forget the supposed death photos that were presented during the Conrad Murray trial, the name on those photos were also incorrect.  All of them, and I do mean ALL have the name Michael Joseph Jackson, but we all know his legal name is Michael JOE Jackson. (His driver's license shows this correctly), but NOT ONE DOCUMENT SINCE MICHAEL'S SUPPOSED DEATH DO WE HAVE A LEGAL DOCUMENT WITH HIS CORRECT NAME ON IT.  You would have thought that one of these documents would have had his name correct on it, wouldn't you?


Then there was Latoya Jackson's revelation in a video that I put out here awhile back, where she talks about one of Michael's kids letting Randy Phillips, CEO of AEG Live into Michael's house on June 24, 2009 when Michael was at rehearsal.  (CLICK HERE to watch video if you missed it).  I'd like to know what he was doing there when he stated under oath during the Conrad Murray Involuntary Manslaughter trial that he was at Michael's rehearsal that night at the Staple Center on June 24, 2009.  So why was he at Michael's house when Michael wasn't there, and who was he meeting with, and about what?


Let’s face it, there is a lot of money to be made off of Michael Jackson, and if you look at the full picture, currently you can see how the estate that is ran by the two attorneys who supposedly were named executors on the Last Will in Testament; (that some think is a fake), I’m sure you can see the millions of dollar that has already been made.  It’s so much money that even Michael’s mother, Katherine has had to question this estate and where all of the money has gone.  She has stated that she has seen very little of it.  Now, I know Michael Jackson had huge debts, but when Katherine Jackson requested this information she got what I would call a lot of grandstanding by these two attorneys.  Was this intentional?  I really couldn’t say, but it does make one wonder. 


I’m sure we’re all familiar with the saying that you’re worth more dead than alive, right?  Well, we all know Michael Jackson definitely was.  We also got to know that all of the players knew this as well, (AEG Live, Dr. Tohme, John Branca, John McClain, and maybe even Michael Jackson himself knew this.


One thing is for sure I'm sure we haven't heard the last of this.  In fact, I am sure there is still more to come on the Jackson front.  Just some more things for you to think about here, wouldn't you say?



Saturday, September 15, 2012

Michael Jackson: Death Hoax = Breaking News - AEG Live drops $17.5 Million dollar claim!

Randy Phillips, CEO of AEG Live
If you've been following my blog you would know that my last entry was about AEG Live, the promoter's of Michael Jackson's "This Is It" concerts had filed a claim with the insurance company that was insuring these concerts for $17.5 million dollars (Lloyd's of London) back in 2009'.  Well, shortly after my last blog entry came out AEG Live dropped its claim. (Interesting)

AEG Live attorney's denied that dropping this claim was due to leaks of emails that the Los Angeles Times published on September 2, depicting concerns by AEG executives that Michael Jackson's health was deteriorating.  The attorney's for AEG Live went on to say that the reason for dropping their claim was because they no longer needed the money.  Their attorney, Marvin Putnam stated that they had been reimbursed by the Jackson estate for its concert losses.  He went on to state that he had informed Lloyd's of London of this back in June.  (This I find interesting since we all know that the Jackson estate is ran by attorney's, John Branca and John McClain, which some of the Jackson family is currently fighting with over what they call Michael Jackson's faked Last Will and Testament).

Why it took AEG Live a whole three years to drop this claim I find quite interesting.  They say it had nothing to do with these damaging emails, but come on!  These emails came out on September 2, and they drop their claim, which they say was back in June, but we only found out about all of this on September 10, 2012.  (I'm not sure what to believe here)
Katherine Jackson with Michael Jackson

One last note:  AEG Live still faces a wrongful death lawsuit by Michaels' mother, Katherine Jackson.  Mrs. Jackson contends that the company is responsible for bringing Dr. Conrad Murray into making medical decisions for her son that was inappropriate.  This court case is scheduled to be heard next year. (Should be interesting to see what happens here, especially since there is a large group that still believes Michael Jackson is still very much alive).

As I stated before, this isn't going away…





Sunday, September 9, 2012

Michael Jackson: Death Hoax = What Truly Is Up With A.E.G. Lives Lawsuit?

We have discussed in detail about some of the stuff that doesn’t add up with the production company A.E.G. Live, who were the concert promoter's for Michael Jackson's "This Is It" concert series. It seems it has come to light that not only does the Jackson family have a lawsuit against A.E.G. Live for the wrongful death of their beloved Michael, but apparently A.E.G. Live has one against the insurance company "Lloyd's of London" for 17.5 Million Dollars. According, to an article that I just came across, A.E.G. Live has filed this lawsuit against this insurance company because they are refusing to settle Michael’s insurance policy that A.E.G. Live had taken out on the superstar if he were unable to complete his concert series. Lloyd's of London is claiming that A.E.G. Live misled them in what Michael Jackson's actual condition was. I can't really say what is truly going on here.  You're going to have to decide this for yourself.


I say you have to decide for yourself about this because, although I love the Internet and it’s a great source for research purposes, it's not 100% accurate in its information. That’s why some refer to it as a content mill. Take it from someone who has done it and in fact is doing it right now. Anyone can write stuff and put it out here, whether it's completely factual or not. Why do you think I use so many videos out here?  I do it to try to show actual proof of what I have found.  So the article is just that, but is this actually based in truth?


Now, I do believe some of this is true though, I wouldn’t doubt for a minute given some of the shady things we’ve discussed here about A.E.G. Live that they do in fact have a lawsuit against Lloyd's of London. This might explain why the Jackson family has filed suit against them; after all, Michael's estate doesn't need the money. But, what about the part about Lloyd’s of London, I must be honest I find this part hard to swallow and I’ll explain why. Don’t most high end insurance companies such as Lloyd’s of London do their own physicals on people before insuring them?  (I understand, Michael did take a four hours physical and passed it).  I don’t know what the issue actually is with Lloyd’s of London, but I am finding it hard to believe it's because they were duped into believing Michael was in better condition than he was, (this is Lloyd’s of London we’re talking about), I highly doubt it's hard to put one over on them.  Some of the Death Hoax believer might think that the reason Lloyd's of London haven't paid out is because they know Michael Jackson is still alive, right?


Then there is a part in the article that I read which stated some things about choreographer, Kenny Ortega stating that Michael Jackson was in very poor condition. Funny, how he never discussed this in any of his interviews or even during the court case, other than the one incident that he mentioned when Michael showed up with flu-like symptoms one night. Now, once again I am led to wonder if this statement is true because of this reason. Let’s remember what happened to singer, Aaron Carter who gave an innocent interview about his relationship with Michael Jackson, and the next thing we knew it was all over the Internet that Aaron said Michael Jackson would give him alcohol and drugs, and this turned out not to be true. Ortega could have said that Michael would have an occasional drink after rehearsal, (which wouldn’t be odd for Michael to do), and the next thing you know Michael is drinking heavily during rehearsals. Come on if that were the case wouldn’t the alcohol have appeared in his autopsy, which it didn’t.


So what we have here is an alleged statement by Ortega regarding this incident, and yes now I am using alleged, it’s a little hard not to when it comes to some of the stuff that has happened since Michael’s apparent death. I’ll hold out judgment here till Ortega shows up in court and actually makes these so-called allegations.


As for this lawsuit, I have to wonder what A.E.G. Live is truly up to. Seriously, so what if Lloyd’s of London has refused to settle for whatever reason? Didn’t A.E.G. Live make millions off the rehearsal footage that came from the "This Is It" documentary concert film?  And, then didn't they make more off the DVD release of it and the soundtrack for it? Do they really need to go file a lawsuit against this insurance company? Haven’t they made enough money off Michael Jackson, even in his supposed death?


Randy Phillips, CEO of AEG Live
I have to ask the question again what A.E.G. Live is truly up to.  I keep thinking about two things in regards to all of this.  First, I keep thinking about what Conrad Murray said about A.E.G. Live C.E.O., Randy Phillips. 
                        (Click Here to watch video).

Latoya Jackson

Then I can't forget Michael's sister, Latoya and her claims about Randy Phillips. 


So what is truly going on here?  You'll have to decide for yourself.  One thing is for sure…this is not over by a long shot!





Sunday, September 2, 2012

What Is Up With Michael Joe Jackson's Name?

In this blog entry I want to explore something that I have talked about before out here and that was Michael Jackson's legal name.  This is something that many people have questioned in Michael's Last Will and Testament and in the Conrad Murray Involuntary Manslaughter Case, where his name was stated as Michael Joseph Jackson, when in fact his legal name is Michael Joe Jackson.


Now I know I have explored many avenues on this website about what might have happened to Michael Jackson on June 25, 2009. I have discussed the possibility that he was kidnapped, that he might have been murdered, and of course that he staged his own death. For many of you it may seem like I have started to lean towards murder around here more than anything else. I am here to tell you this isn’t exactly true, because although there are some valid things that point to him meeting with foul play, there are things that still can’t be explained if we went with that theory only, and I have discussed some of those thing out here on this blog; things that still have many of us on the fence wondering if this is still all just one big hoax.


First of all, no matter how anyone wants to justify it that Conrad Murray Trial was the strangest trial I have ever seen and I watched on daytime TV.  I would have to say that soap opera trials made more sense. The defendant didn't rise to hear the verdict, and the verdict used the non-definitive word alleged more than once. Go to and look at verdicts in general and find me just one that has actually used this word the same way that this one did and I just might believe that this was a real trial. Oh, and then there was the wonderful part where the judge just happens to bring attention to the fact that the jury changed the date of the supposed verdict form. (Say what?) Seriously, don’t tell me this isn’t a big deal because it is! Let's face it, this is a court of law, or at least I think it was and anytime you change the wording or date of a legal document is a big deal, believe me I know from experience. It turns out in order to do this the jury would have had to have filled out a correction form. I don’t recall the judge asking if this form was filled out, did you?


This is where my biggest pet peeve comes into play, and rightfully so, the legal documents involved in the death of Michael Joseph Jackson. First, let me just say if you've been following all of the happenings since Michael's supposed death then we all know that Michael's legal name is Michael Joe Jackson and not Michael Joseph Jackson, right?  Some of you might think what is the big deal about all of this?  Well, there is a big deal in regards to this name.  In fact, former prosecutor Tom Sneddon made sure in the Michael Jackson Child Molestation trial that all documents had the correct name on them.  He wanted to make certain that if he got a conviction that Michael wouldn't walk free over a technicality with his name, which believe it or not could have happened if the name hadn't been correct on all legal documents.


Now I want to discuss the really strange and odd thing about all of this.  Every document since Michael's suppose death has had the name Michael Joseph Jackson on them.  None of them, (not one) has had his correct name.  I find this rather strange.  You would think one of these very important legal documents would have had his legal name of Michael Joe Jackson on them.  (But, NOT EVEN ONE) From his autopsy report, his death certificate, his Last Will and Testament. Even all the papers filed and used during Conrad Murray’s Involuntary Manslaughter Trial ever stated his correct legal name.


Pearl Jr.
Firm Believer, or as she now refers to herself Knower, Producer, Writer, Journalist, Pearl Jr., recently did a video regarding this horrendous error.



Whether you agree 100% with everything Pearl Jr. has talked about in the past you have to admit she has a point here. Michael’s driver's license and passport both said Michael Joe Jackson and this is an important thing to know because before either of these is issued you have to produce your birth certificate. This is one of the first legal documents that are issued for a human being, and it is the one that is proof of your existence. In fact, after a person dies the first words from any mortuary is do you have their birth certificate? Why, because this tells them the exact date the person was born and the exact name of the individual, even if this wasn’t the name they used in life.

There is actually a story pertaining to the late king of rock and roll Elvis Presley. His full name was, of course Elvis Aaron Presley, but his middle name was misspelled on his tombstone. This led to even more belief that he wasn’t dead, even though the error wasn’t a huge one and was quickly fixed. But still, there were those who wanted to believe this, however, if we were to look at Elvis death certificate, autopsy report, Last Will and Testament, his name is correct. Remember, this was fixed quite quickly and we’re only talking about a tombstone not a huge amount of legal documents; that yes, can have errors but these errors are caught quickly and fixed so that there will be no legal ramifications.

For some of you this may not seem like a big deal, but let me tell you it is. Any mistake on a legal document, such as putting down the wrong date or the wrong name can have a document declared invalid. This is why when you watch Pearl Jr.'s video and she talks about filling out her own legal documents, it was boldly in her face to insure the name of the person she was filing the motion against was EXACTLY correctly. Why do you think the Jackson family is currently questioning the validity of Michael’s Last Will and Testament? Not only does it have the wrong name, but also according to them the wrong date. No legal document that suppose to be worth more than the paper it's printed on would have such glaring mistakes on it after being filed in a court of law.


So what can we deduct from the fact that there are so many legal documents that have glaring mistakes on them. Well, some including Pearl Jr. have a theory which does make some sense. As some have pointed out if Michael had staged his own death, he would have committed fraud, he can go to jail for this. However, if it's not his actual legal name that is appearing on all of these documents, this is a technicality that could keep him from being prosecuted (sorry, Sneddon), According to these documents it was a Michael Joseph Jackson that died on June 25, 2009, and not Michael Joe Jackson.


One last thing you might want to think about, shortly after Michael's supposed death the new media had release a song of Michael's called, "A Place With No Name", and when you think about it there is such a place, it is Michael's supposed gravesite at Forest Lawn Cemetery.  (Remember no name has been place on this grave).  And, then there is the song that Michael's good friend Barry Gibb released that he and Michael did together called, "All In Your Name".  I don't know about many of you but I am starting to wonder if these are all clues that we should be paying attention to.


Just some more things to think about here…


Saturday, August 25, 2012

Jackson Family vs. Michael Jackson's Executors of his Last Will and Testament…Why Did it Take so Long?

In my previous blog entry I talked about the latest happenings inside the Jackson family where some of them have sent a letter to their late brothers executor's of his "Last Will and Testament", (John Branca and John McClain), asking for them to step down from their duties of executors of their brothers Will.  As I stated in my previous entry some of the Jackson's believe that the Will is a fake because of the date that was on the document.  The date of the so-called signing in Los Angeles was actually a date where Michael was in New York with the Rev. Al Shapton. 

It has recently comes to light that, although some of the Jackson family members have sent this letter to Mr. Branca and Mr. McClain to step down, the problem that I have with this is that the Jackson's have not sought out any legal actions against them.  I'm trying to figure out why not?  I mean, if they have proof…and they obviously do since I showed you a video of Michael and Rev. Sharpton in New York in the previous blog entry on the date Michael supposedly was in Los Angeles signing this so-called Will.  So my question is why haven't they sought legal action against this Will?  An even bigger question that I have is why have they waited over three years since Michael's supposed death to stir this all up now?  Why didn't they do it from the very beginning?  I mean, it wasn't like they hadn't questioned the Will from the beginning with the way certain names were not correct on the document.  So again, I ask why NOW?

I did discover that, although the Jackson siblings hadn't filed any legal action against the Will that Michael's mother, Katherine Jackson did file legal documents back on July 19, 2012 asking the executors to hand over for inspection and audit all supporting documents in regards to Michael's estate so that she could see where all the money was going. But, interestingly enough the executors, attorney's John Branca and John McClain had issues with the request stating that they objected to the request because it was too vague and ambiguous.  They stated that the request would encompass thousands of pages and they also stated that the request seeks highly confidential business and financial information.  The executors went on to state that most of the contracts that the estate had entered into are sealed because they include trade secrets and other confidential privileged information, and that this is usually something that is done to protect the interest of the estate. (Say what?  One has to wonder about all of this and what they might be possibly hiding, right)?

So I have to go back to my original question if Michael Jackson is in fact dead what has taken the Jackson's so long to start questioning the tactics of Mr. Branca and Mr. McClain?  Yes, I will admit some of the things that Branca and McClain have done I feel wouldn't have been something that Michael would have wanted; like the Sony music deal with them releasing new unreleased music of his.  I also don't think Michael would have agreed to the Pepsi deal, since in the past Pepsi had dropped him from their business campaigns because of the alleged child molestation charges.  So I don't know if some of this has to do with why the Jackson's are stewing about this Will right now, or if there is another reason.

Some who believe in the Death Hoax might say that Michael isn't happy about what is going down and that he wants his siblings to fight this.  Now I don't know if I can believe that, but I will admit that some of what the Jackson's are saying is obviously true in regards to the date of the Will and that it couldn't have been signed on that date since Michael wasn't in Los Angeles at the time.  But, once again, what is it about right now, over three years after their brother's supposed death that has brought all of this up?  Truly…what is it?
One thing is for sure, I have said this time and time again on this blog, it is amazing how this story never seems to go away. What do you think this might really be telling all of us?

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Do We Now Have Proof That Michael Jackson is in Fact Dead? (Part 2 of 2)

In my recent blog entry I went into the recent Jackson Family drama, and whether all of this truly points to Michael Jackson really being dead. In Part 2, I want to try to analyze what went on here, (yeah I know lots of luck with this one), because like Michael’s death this family drama doesn’t make much sense either. Think about this for a minute…with Katherine Jackson walking away from her grand children, (Prince, Paris, and Blanket) for over 9 days and then losing guardianship, and all she could say when she returned home was that she couldn't understand why all of this was blown out of proportion.  Well, I only have one things to say in regards to all of this and that is two and two isn’t adding up once again to four, which was how things were with Michael’s death and why I believe there is still a death hoax in the first place.

Anyway, if you've been following this, then you've probably been hearing the liberal media, which of course has been telling us all that the Jackson’s are nothing but money grubbing leeches and that their only using their mother to get their hands on the billion dollar estate Michael left behind. I got news for the liberal media the only Jackson ever painted as a money grubbing leech by Michael himself was his father, Joe Jackson. Sorry, Joe but this is what Michael has said about you more than once?

(Click Video Below to listen to a phone conversation about this).

Despite the turbulent relationship Michael had with his brothers and sisters at various times he never spoke of them as wanting him only for his money. His talent maybe, but never his money, at least that was never stated by Michael himself, not that I know of. But, here is the liberal media saying that the Jackson’s want his money, they are mad they weren’t in Michael's Last Will and Testament", they have money issues…blah, blah, blah. Seriously, if these people ever took the time to actually research a story and not relied only on their so called sources they might actually get the whole picture for a change. Such as, the Jackson brothers just got done doing a highly successful summer concert tour where they were reported to have made several million dollars. Tito Jackson also is a highly successful musician who has toured on his own, and his sons, better known as "The Three T’s" are a highly successful singing group. Latoya Jackson has two successful businesses, Marlon Jackson makes regular humanitarian trips to Africa, which tells me he has to have a certain amount of money himself to do this. Michael's brother, Randy had donated thousands of dollars to charities, (one of these donations he gave allowed a young girl to have surgery that her family stated they could have never afforded.

I don’t know what Marlon and Randy do, but their obviously not living in cardboard boxes desperate for money if their forking over that kind of money to help others. Jackie and Jermaine continue their own music endeavors which included the recent concert tour. Michael's eldest sister, Reebie is married to a highly successful man, and let's not even go there with Janet, she is a highly successful actress as well as recording artist.

I am amazed that this garbage that is being spewed by the liberal media is being so widely accepted, including the crap that Randy and Jermaine have approached the estate requesting money to pay alimony, (gee funny how the estate used this when it was no secret that Jermaine was trying to get his alimony payments lowered last year), who would dispute this claim after that, right? PLEASSSSE....

According to the Jackson family this is actually about disputing the supposed Last Will and Testament of Michael Jackson, and that they are not trying to stake a claim to it, but more like questioning the validity of the document as being legitimate. They are disputing the legitimacy of this Will and who the executors of this Will are. Remember, that Tito Jackson sits on the board of this estate, and according to reports from the Jackson family Tito has stated that he doesn’t approve of how the executors, John Branca and John McClain are handling the estate and that he feels more money should have been turned over to Michael’s Kids as well as his mother at this point. So the Jackson family has set out to contest the Will, and whether or not it's real, and some in the liberal media are painting it as if they are grasping at straws. But guess what, maybe they're not. Many of us on this blog have questioned the legitimacy of this Will ourselves. Well, it turns out there was reason to, according to long time Michael Jackson friend and talk show host Reverend Al Shapton, who actually got to talk to Randy Jackson during all of this drama as it was playing out and probably still is.

(CLICK HERE to watch video) 
Yep, Michael was with Rev. Al Sharpton in New York all day on the day that Michael was supposedly in L.A. signing this so-called Will. Now I know we have discussed the possibility of their being two Michael Jackson’s, but unless this is indeed the case how can the executor's of the estate explain this? Well, guess what they do have an explanation, saying maybe the date was written wrong on the document. (Ugh), no wonder this freaking death hoax continues, with the amount of legal documents that have the wrong name, wrong date, crossed out information then corrected (which by law you can’t do) you have to wonder what is going on here. I personally have worked around lawyers, I’ve dealt with lawyers, I can honestly tell you no legal document that is legally binding and considered legally binding is going to have the wrong dates, the wrong name, the wrong information, this leads to more legal ramifications then a court could handle. So if Branca and McClain want to claim the document has the wrong date, this is enough leverage to have the Will thrown out. 

Also, I find it rather odd that Michael Jackson and John Branca just got back together just one week before Jackson's death after many years of being alienated from each other. In fact it was claimed that Michael at one time stated he didn't trust Branca, and yet after Michael's supposed death we all found out that Branca was named as one of the excutor's on Michael's Last Will and Testament. (Say what)???? 
As for Michael, where does this leave us where he is concerned, is this enough proof that he is actually dead? I know it's not something many of us want to accept, it would be nicer to hold on to the death hoax because it means are beloved Michael is still out there somewhere. But, would Michael if he were still truly alive have sat back and watched while his kids were scared to death about what happened to their grandmother. All right, some could argue that maybe he didn’t, maybe he was the one who encouraged TJ to file for temporary custody and maybe he is the one who orchestrated the whole contesting of the Will, to get rid of Branca and McClain once and for all.
So where is he in all of this if he is still alive? Well, that is a question that can’t be answered as of right now. I do have to admit that I might have reasons to believe that Michael could be in fact dead, and that if he is we have a whole lot of conspirators giving us smoke and mirrors to have us not look at what really happened, and yet I still can’t abandon the death hoax completely. After all, no one can still explain to me someone with somewhat of a legal background why there are so many legal documents involved in this mess that shouldn’t be considered legal in a Court of Law, along with other stuff that still can’t be explained away. Still, I have to wonder if Michael is alive what is it that would be so serious that he wouldn’t have come out of hiding to save his own kids, whom meant more to him then his own life.
So my next question to you would be the third thing that I brought up as a possibility to where Michael Jackson is if he is still in fact alive. The three things I've mention throughout several blog entries has been death hoax, foul play, and the other thing that is still a strong possibility is…he was kidnapped, and is still being held against his will.
Just something more to think about here…